Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry quizzed a counsel for Tethyan Copper Company (TCC) for his claims of vested interests in award of mining lease for exploration of precious minerals resources in Reko Diq area of Balochistan province.
Heading a three Judge bench over the pending issue of award of mining lease for gold and copper reserves, the Chief Justice asked Mr Khalid Anwar counsel for TCC as to how the Balochistan High Court could said that the company had vested rights.
He observed that there could be no vested rights for any particular company, only those rights which were subjected to laws. What matters for Court is the laws. The counsel that judgement of the licensing authority was not impugned before us.
Mr Khalid Anwar contended that the BHC verdict was in his favor which had two vital components. The verdict did not hold anywhere that the mineral wealth of the province was wasted and pleaded that the Court could not settle the questions of facts.
The counsel further said that the Chief Minister of Balochistan could not took decision over the issue by terming it as policy issue. The CJ reminded him that the Chagi Hills Exploration Joint Venture Agreement was an agreement between the parties which was not statutory and what mattered them was the rules.
He said that the current incumbent chief minister was not on the scene during 2006. The licensing authority did not mention anything in its order that it was provincial cabinet's decision
Replying to a query of Justice Sh Azmat Saeed, the counsel said that they had dispute with both federal and provincial government. He contended that all the allegations made about CHEJVA and relaxations of rules were directed against the BHP, its predecessor company and not against the TCCP. TCCP was not in existence when relaxation of rules took place on January 24th 1994.
The TCC was entitled for all the legal rights of innovation agreement of May 1st 2006 after BHP entirely left the scene and had not further legal rights or obligations and the Government of Balochistan independently conferred the legal duty and obligations to TCC.
The Chief Justice supplemented him by saying that he wanted to establish that TCC had an independent stance and had nothing to do with all this. He told him that if it was his stance then why he was undertaking a long exercise of reading out volumes of papers for the last two weeks.
