The LED industry has no accepted protocol for measuring and characterizing luminaire lifetime, but a new guideline from SSL Quality Advocates considers the key issues.
A DOE Solid-State Lighting (SSL) Quality Advocates working group, a group of 32 industry experts on reliability, LEDs and lighting, was formed in 2006 to determine a series of recommendations for LED reliability, or methods for estimating LED lifetime.
Members of the working group
Three members of the working group — Fred Welsh of Radcliffe Advisors (Chestertown, MD), Terry Clarke, CEO of Finelite (Union City, CA), and Steve Paolini of Lunera Lighting Inc. (Redwood City, CA) — presented reliability material at the DOE Solid State Lighting Workshop held in Seattle, WA this week (July 12-14). Marc Ledbetter of the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL, Portland, OR) moderated the discussion.
Jointly developed by the US DOE and the Next Generation Lighting Industry Alliance (NGLIA), SSL Quality Advocates is a voluntary pledge program formed over two years ago to assure that LED lighting, as it reaches the market, is represented accurately. The Advocates encourage the continual development of high-quality products that perform as claimed to help drive market acceptance of SSL products.
In December 2008, the SSL Quality Advocates working group published a guideline document entitled "Reporting LED Luminaire Product Performance" to help the industry to improve its reporting of product quality. A new guideline document, entitled LED Luminaire Lifetime: Recommendations for Testing and Reporting, goes further by providing testing and reporting recommendations.
The working group determined that reliability based on lumen depreciation is the most significant and quantifiable cause of LED and luminaire failure. Color shift, while a very real factor in luminaire performance to the customer, is too difficult to quantify at present. As a result, “it has been taken off the table,” as Clark explained. He said that the group deliberated extensively over ways that color stability might be included as a lifetime metric, but a method for doing so could not be determined.
What constitutes a luminaire failure?
Welsh began by differentiating between catastrophic failures and design flaws that can cause luminaire failures. Design flaws can include poor thermal management, overdriving the LED chips, thermal driver failures, mechanical failures and unreliable seals. Such flaws should cause early failures during testing and typically can be fixed from the design side. Real failures, on the other hand, are caused by electrical failure, lumen depreciation and color shift. With appropriately-designed drive current, operating temperature and driver components, LEDs should follow a traditional electronic-component failure curve, also known as a bathtub curve.
The bathtub curve is characterized by a rash of early failures, typically due to design issues, which can precede delivery of the device to the customer, followed by a very low failure rate until the device nears its end-of-life, when failures occur very quickly. Welsh commented, “Manufacturers should state if a luminaire is serviceable, or if one or more components including the driver, optics, light strip, etc., can be replaced.” Serviceability, of course, depends on whether the parts are available when needed and can be easily accessed for replacement.
Causes of SSL field failures
Paolini commented that LED luminaire failure data is hard to come by in the literature. However, he did present interesting data from Appalachian Lighting Systems (Ellwood City, PA) that showed the cause of 29 field failures from 5400 outdoor luminaires (see pie chart). Most often the driver (power supply) was the cause of the failures (52%) followed by the luminaire housing itself at 31% of failures.
After considering many recommendations for lifetime assessment based on current standards or testing methods, the Quality Advocates working group recommended that manufacturers report a lumen-depreciation value for a given time, say 25,000 hours. They further recommended that manufacturers can offer reasonable warrantee periods, such as 3 years, on products. However, the group emphasized the important difference between lifetime estimations and lumen depreciation. “The industry needs to stop referring to LM-80 as relating to lifetime, it’s only lumen maintenance and it looks at one failure mechanism at L70, not lifetime,” said Welsh.
Paolini recommended that purchasers of luminaires should request data from the manufacturers. This data should include LM-80 tests done at operating temperature; temperature cycling tests; highly accelerated standardized testing (forcing failures, then determining causes) and long-term reliability testing at use conditions for 10,000 hours or more. “It is also useful to visit installations that have the fixtures you are interested in to see how they are performing,” he suggested.
Call for industry participation
In addition, IESNA is preparing to release a new TM-21 standard, entitled "Method for Estimation of LED Lumen Depreciation as a Measure of Potential LED Life," due out within a month. This method, when combined with data from LM-80 for the luminaire system, will allow estimations of LED source lifetime (only) inside the luminaire. Notably, it will say nothing about the lifetime of the whole luminaire, which is essentially an electronic system made up of multiple components including a dimmer, power supply, LED, optics and interconnections, each with its own reliability issues.
Phoseon Technology of Hillsboro, Oregon USA, has introduced the FirePower™ product family with three curing length options, a 150x20 mm, a 225x20mm, and a 300x20mm solution. The water-cooled FirePower family of UV LED lamps allows new applications in the wide-format digital segment while also allowing system builders to increase their speed in other applications.
The company says that the UV LED lamps use Phoseon's patented SLM™ technology, which provide high power 16 W/cm2 of UV LED light for maximum UV energy, control electronics for simple system integration, and advanced structural capability for better field serviceability.
The company points out the LED-based UV curing offers economic savings, environmentally friendliness, and new systems capability, in comparison to other UV curing technologies. Phoseon's products add what the company says is high performance, maximum UV energy, and outstanding reliability for customer's tough curing environments.
Bill Cortelyou, CEO and President of Phoseon Technology stated, "These products prove UV LEDs have the power and long-life capability to replace older mercury-based lamp technology. Current Alpha-site customers are enjoying the benefits of energy-efficient, reliable, and safe UV LED curing. Phoseon continues to focus its resources and lead the way for making high-performance, high-reliable UV LED curing systems a success."
Source:
